National Directory of Mediators and online mediation
Type of mediation

Administrative mediation

Disputes between citizens or organisations and government bodies, within the limits permitted by law.

Administrative mediation is the resolution of disagreements between citizens or businesses on the one hand and state bodies or organisations on the other, with the help of an independent intermediary. For a long time it was assumed that the only way to challenge the state was through a complaint or a court. However, Kazakhstan's modern administrative legislation, above all the Administrative Procedural and Process Code, provides for conciliation procedures, including mediation, to the extent permitted by law. The general principles of mediation are set out in the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Mediation".

The key feature of this type of mediation is that a state body acts only within its competence and the law. It cannot "agree" to anything that contradicts regulatory requirements, but it can find a lawful option that suits both parties, for example by reconsidering how a decision is to be implemented, correcting an error or clarifying the grounds for a decision.

Which disputes and situations are suitable

  • disputes over the issue, renewal or suspension of permits and licences;
  • disagreements over the results of inspections and orders issued by supervisory authorities;
  • land-related disputes with local executive bodies;
  • issues concerning the provision of public services, refusals and service delivery times;
  • disputes over charges and obligations where the law allows them to be settled;
  • conflicts relating to the performance of public procurement contracts, where they are dealt with through a permissible procedure;
  • situations where the dispute arose from incomplete information or a misreading of documents.

How the procedure works

  1. Analysing the situation. The citizen or company, together with a lawyer, determines exactly what is being challenged and whether there is lawful scope for an agreement.
  2. Proposal to settle. The parties state their wish to resolve the dispute before going to court or during administrative court proceedings, when the court explains that a settlement is possible.
  3. Choosing a mediator. The parties agree on an independent mediator; the state body appoints a representative with the appropriate authority.
  4. Exchanging positions. The mediator helps to clarify the facts, the requirements of the law and the parties' interests, and to identify any misunderstandings.
  5. Finding a lawful solution. The parties discuss options that stay within the body's competence: reconsidering an application, submitting missing documents, changing the deadlines for remedying violations.
  6. Recording the outcome. The agreement is put in writing and, if the dispute is already before a court, submitted to the court in accordance with the established procedure.

Advantages over litigation

Litigation against a state body can take considerable time, and a court judgment does not always solve the applicant's practical problem: having an act set aside is not enough if what you need is to obtain a permit and carry on working. Mediation makes it possible to focus on the result. It reduces the burden on both parties, preserves the working relationship with a body that the business or citizen will have to keep dealing with, and often reveals that the dispute arose from a technical error or a misunderstanding.

The mediator's role

In administrative disputes, the mediator helps to balance the negotiating positions: a citizen often feels at a disadvantage when facing a state body, while the body's representative is wary of taking a decision that goes beyond their authority. The mediator does not assess the lawfulness of acts or give instructions to the body; that is the function of the court and higher authorities. The mediator is independent and impartial, structures the discussion, helps the parties speak the same language and check how realistic the proposed options are. Information obtained during the procedure remains confidential to the extent established by law.

The outcome and its legal effect

The outcome of mediation is a written agreement between the parties. If the dispute is before a court, the agreement is submitted to it, and the court checks that it complies with the law and does not infringe the rights of others. The agreement cannot oblige a state body to take action that the law does not permit it to take. If the dispute is settled before it reaches court, the parties perform their obligations voluntarily, and the body formalises its actions in accordance with the established procedure, for example by issuing a new decision.

Limitations: when mediation is impossible or inadvisable

  • where the subject of the dispute concerns matters in which the body has no discretion and the law prescribes the only possible decision;
  • where a settlement would affect the rights and legitimate interests of third parties who are not taking part in the procedure;
  • where the body's representative has not been given the authority to conclude an agreement;
  • where the law expressly prohibits settlement in the category of cases concerned;
  • where one of the parties is using the procedure merely to drag out the process.

How to prepare

Gather all the documents: your applications, the body's replies, inspection reports, decisions and correspondence. Draw up a chronology of events. Decide what practical outcome you need and what concessions you are prepared to make on your side, for example remedying the shortcomings identified within a set period. Check with a lawyer how and within what time limits the decision can be appealed, so that the negotiations do not cause you to miss them.

Example (hypothetical)

A small manufacturing business was refused the renewal of a permit because of comments on its technical documentation. The director considered the refusal unjustified and was preparing a lawsuit. During the conciliation procedure, it emerged that some of the documents had been submitted on an outdated form, and some of the comments were based on incomplete information held by the authority. The parties agreed on a list of documents to be resubmitted, the authority considered the updated application under the standard procedure, and there was no longer any need for protracted litigation.

How to choose a mediator on the portal

In the portal's registry of professional mediators, select your city and the "Administrative" type of mediation. Give preference to specialists with a legal education and experience in public law, public administration or permit procedures. In the online application, briefly describe the substance of the disagreement and state whether the dispute is already before a court: this will help the mediator assess the possible ways of working.

This material is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Please check with a mediator whether mediation is suitable for your particular situation.

Mediators for this type

All (81)

Questions and answers

Can any dispute with a government body be settled through mediation?
No. Only matters on which the law allows the body to enter into agreements. The mediator will help you assess whether this is possible at the first meeting.
Does mediation suspend the deadlines for filing an appeal?
Not necessarily. Keep track of procedural deadlines and consult a lawyer if needed.
Who represents the government body?
An authorised representative with the power to make decisions on the subject matter of the dispute.